Gemini subscribers have two new features to play with

by Yaron

Google Gemini subscribers of the paying variety have some new AI features to play with, the company announced on Wednesday. Not only has Google fixed the Gemini’s image generator, which it paused in February due to “historical inaccuracies,” but it is also rolling out Gems, smaller and more specialized chatbots akin to OpenAI’s GPTs.

When Google introduced its image generator for Gemini in early February, and the tool immediately started cranking out racially biased pictures of racially diverse Nazis and “founding fathers.”

Recommended Videos

“We’re aware that Gemini is offering inaccuracies in some historical image generation depictions,” a Google statement on X (formerly Twitter) from February 21 reads. “We’re working to improve these kinds of depictions immediately. Gemini’s AI image generation does generate a wide range of people. And that’s generally a good thing because people around the world use it. But it’s missing the mark here.”

 

It took the company a few months, but Gemini can once again generate images of humans. But only if you pay for it. To start, Google plans to offer this capability only to Advanced, Business, or Enterprise subscribers. The company did not disclose when it would be available to all users.

“Gemini Advanced gives our users priority access to our latest features,” a Google spokesperson told TechCrunch. “This helps us gather valuable feedback while delivering a highly anticipated feature first to our premium subscribers.”

The company has also announced that it is finally rolling out its Gems feature, which was first introduced at I/O in May. Gems are Gemini’s version of ChatGPT’s GPT, down to the truncated naming structure. They’re essentially mini-chatbots that perform only a few specialized functions, like giving gardening advice, cooking and nutrition tips, or trip planning. Since they’re smaller, they can infer responses more quickly than bringing the entire weight of the larger language model to bear.

Gemini Advanced, Business, and Enterprise subscribers will soon be able to create their own Gems on their mobile and desktop devices in over 150 countries and “most” languages.

  • Computing

ChatGPT’s new Canvas feature sure looks a lot like Claude’s Artifacts
ChatGPT's Canvas screen

Hot on the heels of its $6.6 billion funding round, OpenAI on Thursday debuted the beta of a new collaboration interface for ChatGPT, dubbed Canvas.

“We are fundamentally changing how humans can collaborate with ChatGPT since it launched two years ago,” Canvas research lead Karina Nguyen wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter). She describes it as “a new interface for working with ChatGPT on writing and coding projects that go beyond simple chat.”

Read more

  • Computing

Google’s Gemini Live now speaks nearly four-dozen languages
A demonstration of Gemini Live on a Google Pixel 9.

Google announced Thursday that it is making Gemini Live available in more than 40 languages, allowing global users (no longer just English speakers) to access the conversational AI feature, as well as enabling the full Gemini AI to connect with additional Google apps in more languages.

Gemini Live is Google’s answer to OpenAI’s Advanced Voice Mode or Meta’s Voice Interactions. The feature enables users to converse with the AI as if it were another person, eliminating the need for text-based prompts. Gemini Live made its debut in May during the company’s I/O 2024 event and was initially released for Gemini Advanced subscribers in August before being made available to all users (on Android, at least) in September.

Read more

  • Computing

Google gives Gemini a boost in Sheets and a cool trick in NotebookLM
Working with Google Gemini in Sheets.

Google is expanding Gemini integration within its Workspace suite and has announced a couple of new tricks for its underrated NotebookLM tool. The first in line is the ability to create structured tables in Google Sheets with text prompts.

So far, all tables created by the AI were served in plain text with only bold highlights for the headers. Needless to say, they looked drab and boring, lacking any character at all. There was no text formatting or stylistic edits to the cell contents.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment